lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] sched/numa: Apply imbalance limitations consistently
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:46:52AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:

> > (Although I do wonder about that 25% figure in the comment; that doesn't
> > seem to relate to any actual code anymore)
> >
>
> You're right, by the end of the series it's completely inaccurate and
> currently it's not accurate if there are multiple LLCs per node. I
> adjusted the wording to "Allow a NUMA imbalance if busy CPUs is less
> than the maximum threshold. Above this threshold, individual tasks may
> be contending for both memory bandwidth and any shared HT resources."
>

Looks good. Meanwhile I saw a 0-day complaint that this regresses
something something unixbench by a bit. Do we care enough? I suppose
this is one of those trade-off patches again, win some, loose some.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-18 16:01    [W:0.051 / U:1.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site