lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: edac: nuvoton: add NPCM memory controller
From
Dear Medad,


Am 16.05.22 um 04:30 schrieb Medad Young:

> Paul Menzel 於 2022年5月10日 週二 下午2:14寫道:

>> Am 10.05.22 um 05:10 schrieb Medad CChien:
>>> Document devicetree bindings for the Nuvoton BMC NPCM memory controller.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Medad CChien <ctcchien@nuvoton.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..6f37211796a3
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Nuvoton NPCM Memory Controller
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Medad CChien <ctcchien@nuvoton.com>
>>
>> Just a side note, that in my experience functional like
>> <linux-npcm-memory-controller@nuvoton.com> instead of personal addresses
>> are useful, as you can configure on your side, who to deliver messages
>> to. For example, if you are on sick leave or vacation, you just
>> configure to deliver the message to a colleague of yours (or they get
>> messages in the first place anyway).
>>
>> Maybe you can bring that up at Nuvoton.
>
> I understand, but we do not have group email address.
> so maybe I should add more maintainers?

If there are actually more maintainers, responsible and knowledgeable
for that driver, than yes, these should be added (until you get a
function address set up).


Kind regards,

Paul

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-18 06:38    [W:0.057 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site