lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v20 8/8] soc: mediatek: remove DDP_DOMPONENT_DITHER from enum


On 15/05/2022 00:45, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Matthias:
>
> Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> 於 2022年5月13日 週五 下午3:42寫道:
>>
>> Hi Chun-Kuang,
>>
>> On 02/05/2022 00:54, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
>>> Hi, Matthias:
>>>
>>> Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> 於 2022年4月22日 週五 下午8:42寫道:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 19/04/2022 11:41, jason-jh.lin wrote:
>>>>> After mmsys and drm change DITHER enum to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
>>>>> mmsys header can remove the useless DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER enum.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Chun-Kuang, I think it would make sense to take that through your tree as it
>>>> depends on the previous patches.
>>>>
>>>> I provide you a stable tag so that you can take it:
>>>> v5.18-next-vdso0-stable-tag
>>>
>>> After I take this tag, I find one checkpatch warning:
>>>
>>> WARNING: DT compatible string "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys" appears
>>> un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
>>> #670: FILE: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c:390:
>>> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys",
>>>
>>> I think this tag lost one binding patch, it's better that this tag has
>>> no this warning.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply I was sick.
>> The warning is, because the stable branch misses commit:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.18-next/soc&id=81c5a41d10b968ea89d5f44fe1e5c2fc70289209
>>
>> So it's not a real issue and will go away once our branches land in upstream.
>> Is it OK for you to ignore the issue?
>
> It's OK for me, but the patch would go through different maintainer's
> tree and I'm not sure it's OK for all of them. So I would wait for the
> necessary patch land in upstream.
>

Ok makes sense. Sorry for the bad coordination from my side on this.

Regards,
Matthias

> Regards,
> Chun-Kuang.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chun-Kuang.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 3 +--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> index 59117d970daf..fb719fd1281c 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> @@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ enum mtk_ddp_comp_id {
>>>>> DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR,
>>>>> DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0,
>>>>> DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1,
>>>>> - DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
>>>>> - DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0 = DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
>>>>> + DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
>>>>> DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER1,
>>>>> DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0,
>>>>> DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1,

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-17 12:30    [W:0.053 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site