Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 May 2022 19:25:29 -0500 | From | Rob Herring <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: riscv: document cbom-block-size |
| |
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 11:41:30PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > The Zicbom operates on a block-size defined for the cpu-core, > which does not necessarily match other cache-sizes used. > > So add the necessary property for the system to know the core's > block-size. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml > index d632ac76532e..b179bfd155a3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml > @@ -63,6 +63,13 @@ properties: > - riscv,sv48 > - riscv,none > > + riscv,cbom-block-size: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
Any value 0-2^32 is valid?
> + description: > + Blocksize in bytes for the Zicbom cache operations. The block > + size is a property of the core itself and does not necessarily > + match other software defined cache sizes.
What about hardware defined cache sizes? I'm scratching my head as to what a 'software defined cache size' is.
> + > riscv,isa: > description: > Identifies the specific RISC-V instruction set architecture > -- > 2.35.1 > >
| |