lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/8] s390/entry: workaround llvm's IAS limitations
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 01:11:48PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > So I'd suggest: leave this code as is, and at some later point move
> > "rework" the early machine check handler code.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Sounds very reasonable. Please, find my:
>
> Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks!

> Also, how such a follow-up looks to you?
...
> slgfi %r14,\start
> clgfi %r14,\end - \start

I think using an address as an immediate value is a step in the wrong
direction, since I'd like to have all code pc-relative. And as far as
I can tell this new construct would only work as long as \start has an
absolute address that is low enough so that it would work / fit with
slgfi.
Of course this will likely always be the case, but I still think this
is not the way we should go.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-16 16:07    [W:0.111 / U:0.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site