| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 5.17 044/114] net/smc: non blocking recvmsg() return -EAGAIN when no data and signal_pending | Date | Mon, 16 May 2022 21:36:18 +0200 |
| |
From: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit f3c46e41b32b6266cf60b0985c61748f53bf1c61 ]
Non blocking sendmsg will return -EAGAIN when any signal pending and no send space left, while non blocking recvmsg return -EINTR when signal pending and no data received. This may makes confused. As TCP returns -EAGAIN in the conditions described above. Align the behavior of smc with TCP.
Fixes: 846e344eb722 ("net/smc: add receive timeout check") Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512030820.73848-1-guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- net/smc/smc_rx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_rx.c b/net/smc/smc_rx.c index 51e8eb2933ff..338b9ef806e8 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_rx.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_rx.c @@ -355,12 +355,12 @@ int smc_rx_recvmsg(struct smc_sock *smc, struct msghdr *msg, } break; } + if (!timeo) + return -EAGAIN; if (signal_pending(current)) { read_done = sock_intr_errno(timeo); break; } - if (!timeo) - return -EAGAIN; } if (!smc_rx_data_available(conn)) { -- 2.35.1
|