Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/22] iio: replace bitmap_weight with bitmap_weitght_{eq,le} where appropriate | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Sat, 14 May 2022 09:31:23 -0700 |
| |
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 16:53 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2022 08:47:33 -0700 > Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > bitmap_weight_{eq,le} is better than bitmap_weight because it > > may return earlier. > > > > CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> > > CC: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> > > CC: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com> > > CC: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org > > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> > without being cc'd on the cover letter, there is no obvious way for > me to know this is reliant in some series to be found in next. > > Please call out the exact dependency and whilst it's a long list, > it is good to cc all people cc'd on individual patches also > on the cover letter so they have that background information.
When doing a treewide change like this, vger would commonly reject the message because of too many recipients.
> > Change seems fine, but I've no idea when/if to pick it up because of > that lack of information.
You could try using lore with the in-reply-to message header id
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220510154750.212913-6-yury.norov@gmail.com/
that gives you the entire thread.
| |