lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V1 1/5] iio: accel: bmi088: Modified the scale calculate
On Tue, 10 May 2022 09:01:20 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 4:46 PM LI Qingwu
> <Qing-wu.Li@leica-geosystems.com.cn> wrote:
> >
> > The units after application of scale are 100*m/s^2,
> > The scale calculation is only for the device
> > with the range of 3, 6, 12, and 24g,
> > but some other chips have a range of 2, 4, 6, and 8g.
> >
> > Modified the formula to a scale list.
> > The scales in the list are calculated by 1/sensitivity*9.8.
> > The new units after the application of scale are m/s^2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: LI Qingwu <Qing-wu.Li@leica-geosystems.com.cn>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/accel/bmi088-accel-core.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmi088-accel-core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmi088-accel-core.c
> > index a06dae5c971d..0c58ffdd00e3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmi088-accel-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmi088-accel-core.c
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct bmi088_accel_chip_info {
> > u8 chip_id;
> > const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> > int num_channels;
> > + const int scale_table[4][2];
> > };
> >
> > struct bmi088_accel_data {
> > @@ -280,6 +281,7 @@ static int bmi088_accel_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > struct bmi088_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap);
> > int ret;
> > + int reg;
> >
> > switch (mask) {
> > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > @@ -330,13 +332,12 @@ static int bmi088_accel_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > return ret;
> >
> > ret = regmap_read(data->regmap,
> > - BMI088_ACCEL_REG_ACC_RANGE, val);
> > + BMI088_ACCEL_REG_ACC_RANGE, &reg);
>
> Curios: do we need to validate the value of `reg` here?
> If it goes outside of the 0...3 range, I can see a bit of access
> violation (kernel panic) happening.
>
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_read_raw_pm_put;
> > -
> > - *val2 = 15 - (*val & 0x3);
> > - *val = 3 * 980;
> > - ret = IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
>
> Not sure what the policy is about changing this now.
> I'll leave this to Jonathan.

It shouldn't be a problem as userspace ABI is a decimal string either way.
Only impact might be on precision and those tend to be minor.

>
> > + *val = data->chip_info->scale_table[reg][0];
> > + *val2 = data->chip_info->scale_table[reg][1];
> > + ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> >
> > goto out_read_raw_pm_put;
> > default:
> > @@ -432,6 +433,7 @@ static const struct bmi088_accel_chip_info bmi088_accel_chip_info_tbl[] = {
> > .chip_id = 0x1E,
> > .channels = bmi088_accel_channels,
> > .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(bmi088_accel_channels),
> > + .scale_table = {{0, 897}, {0, 1795}, {0, 3590}, {0, 7179}},
>
> I like the idea of this scale_table.
> It makes things easier to see (what's happening) without looking into
> the datasheet much.
>
> > },
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-14 17:06    [W:0.055 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site