Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 May 2022 08:48:24 +0200 | From | Hannes Reinecke <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 10/23] ata: libahci_platform: Parse ports-implemented property in resources getter |
| |
On 5/12/22 01:17, Serge Semin wrote: > The ports-implemented property is mainly used on the OF-based platforms > with no ports mapping initialized by a bootloader/BIOS firmware. Seeing > the same of_property_read_u32()-based pattern has already been implemented > in the generic AHCI LLDD (glue) driver and in the Mediatek, St AHCI > drivers let's move the property read procedure to the generic > ahci_platform_get_resources() method. Thus we'll have the forced ports > mapping feature supported for each OF-based platform which requires that, > and stop re-implementing the same pattern in there a bit simplifying the > code. > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> > --- > drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c | 2 -- > drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 3 --- > drivers/ata/ahci_st.c | 3 --- > drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c > index 1f6c85fde983..c056378e3e72 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c > @@ -118,8 +118,6 @@ static int mtk_ahci_parse_property(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv, > SYS_CFG_SATA_EN); > } > > - of_property_read_u32(np, "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map); > - > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > index 28a8de5b48b9..9b56490ecbc3 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > @@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (rc) > return rc; > > - of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, > - "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map); > - > if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "hisilicon,hisi-ahci")) > hpriv->flags |= AHCI_HFLAG_NO_FBS | AHCI_HFLAG_NO_NCQ; > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c > index 7526653c843b..068621099c00 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c > @@ -168,9 +168,6 @@ static int st_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > st_ahci_configure_oob(hpriv->mmio); > > - of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, > - "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map); > - > err = ahci_platform_init_host(pdev, hpriv, &st_ahci_port_info, > &ahci_platform_sht); > if (err) { > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c > index 4e54e19f07b2..f7f9cac10cb1 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c > @@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev, > goto err_out; > } > > + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, > + "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map); > + > if (child_nodes) { > for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) { > u32 port;
What happens on the other platforms? Won't they register an error if that property isn't implemented?
Cheers,
Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer
| |