Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 May 2022 16:12:57 -0700 | From | Jakub Kicinski <> | Subject | Re: [RFC,net-next,x86 0/6] Nontemporal copies in unix socket write path |
| |
On Thu, 12 May 2022 15:53:05 -0700 Joe Damato wrote: > 1. Do you have any strong opinions on the sendmsg flag vs a socket option?
It sounded like you want to mix nt and non-nt on a single socket hence the flag was a requirement. socket option is better because we can have many more of those than there are bits for flags, obviously.
> 2. If I can think of a way to avoid the indirect calls, do you think this > series is ready for a v1? I'm not sure if there's anything major that > needs to be addressed aside from the indirect calls.
Nothing comes to mind, seems pretty straightforward to me.
| |