lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC,net-next,x86 0/6] Nontemporal copies in unix socket write path
On Thu, 12 May 2022 15:53:05 -0700 Joe Damato wrote:
> 1. Do you have any strong opinions on the sendmsg flag vs a socket option?

It sounded like you want to mix nt and non-nt on a single socket hence
the flag was a requirement. socket option is better because we can have
many more of those than there are bits for flags, obviously.

> 2. If I can think of a way to avoid the indirect calls, do you think this
> series is ready for a v1? I'm not sure if there's anything major that
> needs to be addressed aside from the indirect calls.

Nothing comes to mind, seems pretty straightforward to me.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-13 01:13    [W:1.277 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site