lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix clang-format configuration according to checkpatch.pl
Miguel, what do you think about this series? Do you plan to take it for 
the next merge window? FYI, I plan to use it for Landlock [1] and send
it for the next merge window. Could you publish your pending
clang-format changes so that I can make sure everything is OK?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160513.523257-1-mic@digikod.net

On 06/05/2022 18:01, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series brings some improvements to the clang-format configuration
> to make it compatible with the checkpatch.pl rules:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/8b6b252b-47a6-9d52-f0bd-10d3bc4ad244@digikod.net
>
> I also found that the for_each issue has already been talk about here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHmME9ofzanQTBD_WYBRW49d+gM77rCdh8Utdk4+PM9n_bmKwA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> I use these changes for Landlock.
>
> This is based on v5.18-rc5.
>
> Previous version:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220412153906.428179-1-mic@digikod.net
>
> Regards,
>
> Mickaël Salaün (5):
> clang-format: Update and extend the for_each list with tools/
> clang-format: Update to clang-format >= 6
> clang-format: Fix goto labels indentation
> clang-format: Fix empty curly braces
> clang-format: Fix space after for_each macros
>
> .clang-format | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 169 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 672c0c5173427e6b3e2a9bbb7be51ceeec78093a

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-11 16:19    [W:0.130 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site