lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: rtc: Add TI K3 RTC description
From
On 11/05/2022 02:25, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> This adds the documentation for the devicetree bindings of the Texas
> Instruments RTC modules on K3 family of SoCs such as AM62x SoCs or
> newer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> ---
> Changes since V1:
> Krzysztof's comments addressed:
> * $subject updated
> * assigned-clocks* dropped
> * Dropped the un-necessary quotes
> * Dropped the extra example, which serves no purpose now.
> * compatible is just an enum now.
>
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220412073138.25027-2-nm@ti.com/
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/ti,k3-rtc.yaml | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/ti,k3-rtc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/ti,k3-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/ti,k3-rtc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..444e18df6231
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/ti,k3-rtc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/ti,k3-rtc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Texas Instruments K3 Real Time Clock
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + This RTC appears in the AM62x family of SoCs.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - ti,am62-rtc
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: VBUS Interface clock
> + - description: 32k Clock source (external or internal).
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: vbus
> + - const: osc32k
> +
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + wakeup-source: true
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - interrupts
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> +
> +additionalProperties: false

I didn't brought it earlier (I assumed you used existing RTC examples
for your schema): why this is not including generic rtc.yaml schema?
Isn't this a RTC?


Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-11 18:29    [W:0.047 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site