Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 May 2022 08:26:33 +0900 | From | Byungchul Park <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC v6 00/21] DEPT(Dependency Tracker) |
| |
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:12:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2022 08:38:38 +0900 > Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> wrote: > > > Yes, I was talking about A and L'. > > > > > detect that regardless of L. A nested lock associates the the nesting with > > > > When I checked Lockdep code, L' with depth n + 1 and L' with depth n > > have different classes in Lockdep. > > If that's the case, then that's a bug in lockdep.
Yes, agree. I should've said 'Lockdep doesn't detect it currently.' rather than 'Lockdep can't detect it.'.
I also think we make it for this case by fixing the bug in Lockdep.
> > > > That's why I said Lockdep cannot detect it. By any chance, has it > > changed so as to consider this case? Or am I missing something? > > No, it's not that lockdep cannot detect it, it should detect it. If it is > not detecting it, then we need to fix that.
Yes.
Byungchul > > -- Steve
| |