| Date | Tue, 10 May 2022 16:11:21 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/12] ptrace: cleaning up ptrace_stop |
| |
On 05/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Eric W. Biederman (11): > signal: Rename send_signal send_signal_locked > signal: Replace __group_send_sig_info with send_signal_locked > ptrace/um: Replace PT_DTRACE with TIF_SINGLESTEP > ptrace/xtensa: Replace PT_SINGLESTEP with TIF_SINGLESTEP > ptrace: Remove arch_ptrace_attach > signal: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of assert_spin_locked > ptrace: Reimplement PTRACE_KILL by always sending SIGKILL > ptrace: Document that wait_task_inactive can't fail > ptrace: Admit ptrace_stop can generate spuriuos SIGTRAPs > ptrace: Don't change __state > ptrace: Always take siglock in ptrace_resume > > Peter Zijlstra (1): > sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
OK, lgtm.
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
I still dislike you removed TASK_WAKEKILL from TASK_TRACED, but I can't find a good argument against it ;) and yes, this is subjective.
Oleg.
|