Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:54:26 -0700 | From | Jakub Kicinski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next 02/15] net: dsa: sja1105: Remove usage of iterator for list_add() after loop |
| |
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:28:47 +0200 Jakob Koschel wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c > index b7e95d60a6e4..cfcae4d19eef 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c > @@ -27,20 +27,24 @@ static int sja1105_insert_gate_entry(struct sja1105_gating_config *gating_cfg, > if (list_empty(&gating_cfg->entries)) { > list_add(&e->list, &gating_cfg->entries); > } else { > - struct sja1105_gate_entry *p; > + struct sja1105_gate_entry *p = NULL, *iter; > > - list_for_each_entry(p, &gating_cfg->entries, list) { > - if (p->interval == e->interval) { > + list_for_each_entry(iter, &gating_cfg->entries, list) { > + if (iter->interval == e->interval) { > NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, > "Gate conflict"); > rc = -EBUSY; > goto err; > } > > - if (e->interval < p->interval) > + if (e->interval < iter->interval) { > + p = iter; > + list_add(&e->list, iter->list.prev); > break; > + } > } > - list_add(&e->list, p->list.prev); > + if (!p) > + list_add(&e->list, gating_cfg->entries.prev);
This turns a pretty slick piece of code into something ugly :( I'd rather you open coded the iteration here than make it more complex to satisfy "safe coding guidelines".
Also the list_add() could be converted to list_add_tail().
| |