Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:12:10 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PULL] remove arch/h8300 |
| |
On 4/5/22 15:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:26 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> >>> Should we garbage-collect some of the other nommu platforms where >>> we're here? Some of them are just as stale: >>> >>> 1. xtensa nommu has does not compile in mainline and as far as I can >>> tell never did >>> (there was https://github.com/jcmvbkbc/linux-xtensa/tree/xtensa-5.6-esp32, >>> which >>> worked at some point, but I don't think there was enough interest >>> to get in merged) >> >> Hmm, I build and test nommu_kc705_defconfig in my test system. > > What toolchain do you use for this? Max already pointed out my mistake > regarding xtensa, which I thought does not build at all, but just needs > a toolchain specific to the cpu. >
Home-built using buildroot. I have three different xtensa toolchains (de212, dc232b, and dc233c). The toolchain for kc705_nommu needs the de212 overlay; I think Max pointed to to the information needed to build the compiler. Buildroot has the "XTENSA_OVERLAY_FILE" option to specify the compiler overlay file for the target.
Guenter
| |