lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip: sched/core] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preemption model accessors
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: cfe43f478b79ba45573ca22d52d0d8823be068fa
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/cfe43f478b79ba45573ca22d52d0d8823be068fa
Author: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:52:01
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:24:42 +02:00

preempt/dynamic: Introduce preemption model accessors

CONFIG_PREEMPT{_NONE, _VOLUNTARY} designate either:
o The build-time preemption model when !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
o The default boot-time preemption model when PREEMPT_DYNAMIC

IOW, using those on PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kernels is meaningless - the actual
model could have been set to something else by the "preempt=foo" cmdline
parameter. Same problem applies to CONFIG_PREEMPTION.

Introduce a set of helpers to determine the actual preemption model used by
the live kernel.

Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211112185203.280040-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com
---
include/linux/sched.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index d5e3c00..67f06f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2117,6 +2117,47 @@ static inline void cond_resched_rcu(void)
#endif
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
+
+extern bool preempt_model_none(void);
+extern bool preempt_model_voluntary(void);
+extern bool preempt_model_full(void);
+
+#else
+
+static inline bool preempt_model_none(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE);
+}
+static inline bool preempt_model_voluntary(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY);
+}
+static inline bool preempt_model_full(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT);
+}
+
+#endif
+
+static inline bool preempt_model_rt(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Does the preemption model allow non-cooperative preemption?
+ *
+ * For !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kernels this is an exact match with
+ * CONFIG_PREEMPTION; for CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC this doesn't work as the
+ * kernel is *built* with CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y but may run with e.g. the
+ * PREEMPT_NONE model.
+ */
+static inline bool preempt_model_preemptible(void)
+{
+ return preempt_model_full() || preempt_model_rt();
+}
+
/*
* Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
* task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPTION,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index d575b49..068c088 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8409,6 +8409,18 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
}
}

+#define PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(mode) \
+ bool preempt_model_##mode(void) \
+ { \
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_dynamic_mode == preempt_dynamic_undefined); \
+ return preempt_dynamic_mode == preempt_dynamic_##mode; \
+ } \
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_model_##mode)
+
+PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(none);
+PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(voluntary);
+PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(full);
+
#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */

static inline void preempt_dynamic_init(void) { }
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-05 14:30    [W:0.094 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site