Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Srinivas Kandagatla <> | Subject | [PATCH 09/16] nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync | Date | Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:26:54 +0100 |
| |
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> --- drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c index 162132c7dab9..c1e893c8a247 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c @@ -217,9 +217,8 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv, goto err_clk_rate_set; } - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(priv->dev); if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->dev); dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable power-domain\n"); goto err_reg_enable; } -- 2.21.0
| |