lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 09/16] nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Date
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
---
drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
index 162132c7dab9..c1e893c8a247 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
@@ -217,9 +217,8 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
goto err_clk_rate_set;
}

- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(priv->dev);
if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->dev);
dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable power-domain\n");
goto err_reg_enable;
}
--
2.21.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-29 18:29    [W:0.070 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site