Messages in this thread | | | From | "" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v3 6/9] x86: resctrl: pseudo_lock: Fix to restore to original value when re-enabling hardware prefetch register | Date | Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:51:27 +0000 |
| |
Thanks for the comment.
> Thank you very much for catching this issue. This fix is not specific to or required > by the driver you are creating in this series so you could also extract this patch and > submit it separately as a fix to resctrl.
I would like to send this patch separated from this series next time.
> When you do resubmit there are a few style related points that I highlight here, the > fix itself looks good. > > For the subject, please use "x86/resctrl:" prefix in the subject.
> This needs a Fixes tag. A few patches are impacted by this fix: > > Fixes: 018961ae5579 ("x86/intel_rdt: Pseudo-lock region creation/removal > core") > Fixes: 443810fe6160 ("x86/intel_rdt: Create debugfs files for pseudo-locking > testing") > Fixes: 8a2fc0e1bc0c ("x86/intel_rdt: More precise L2 hit/miss measurements")
I would like to use this prefix and add Fixes tag for the next patch.
> Please do follow the current style of using "reverse fir tree order". > More information in: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docume > ntation/process/maintainer-tip.rst#n587
> Same as above.
I check the URL to fix style problem.
| |