lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Make protocols init fail on basic errors
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 04:05:31PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Bail out of protocol initialization routine early when basic information
> about protocol version and attributes could not be retrieved: failing to
> act this way can lead to a successfully initialized SCMI protocol which
> is in fact not fully functional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 10 +++++++---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/power.c | 10 +++++++---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c | 10 +++++++---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/system.c | 5 ++++-
> 7 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> @@ -370,7 +372,9 @@ static int scmi_clock_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
> if (!cinfo)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - scmi_clock_protocol_attributes_get(ph, cinfo);
> + ret = scmi_clock_protocol_attributes_get(ph, cinfo);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;

Does this result in removal of scmi_dev associated with devm_* calls ?
Otherwise we may need to free the allocated buffers ? I am not sure
if the dev here is individual scmi_dev or the platform scmi device.
I assume latter and it is unlikely to be removed/freed with the error in
the above path.

Similarly in couple of other instances/protocols.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-26 17:36    [W:0.829 / U:23.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site