| From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <> | Subject | [PATCH v6 02/17] s390: define get_cycles macro for arch-override | Date | Sat, 23 Apr 2022 23:26:08 +0200 |
| |
S390x defines a get_cycles() function, but it forgot to do the usual `#define get_cycles get_cycles` dance, making it impossible for generic code to see if an arch-specific function was defined.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> --- arch/s390/include/asm/timex.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/timex.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/timex.h index 2cfce42aa7fc..ce878e85b6e4 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/timex.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/timex.h @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static inline cycles_t get_cycles(void) { return (cycles_t) get_tod_clock() >> 2; } +#define get_cycles get_cycles int get_phys_clock(unsigned long *clock); void init_cpu_timer(void); -- 2.35.1
|