Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:09:36 -0700 | From | Minchan Kim <> | Subject | Re: PANIC: "Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI" starting from 5.17 on dual socket Intel Xeon Gold servers |
| |
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 08:44:17PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 22.04.22 20:27, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 06:47:41AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > > [...] > > Many thx for looking into this. > > > Jirka, Could you test the patch? Once it's confirmed, I need to resend > > it with Ccing stable. > > When you do so, could you please include a proper "Link:" tag pointing > to all reports of the regression, as explained in the Linux kernels > documentation (see 'Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst' and > 'Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst'). E.g. in this case: > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215696 > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAE4VaGDZr_4wzRn2___eDYRtmdPaGGJdzu_LCSkJYuY9BEO3cw@mail.gmail.com/
Sure. Will do that.
> > This concept is not new (Linus and quite a few other developers use them > like this for a long time), I just recently improved those documents to > clarify things, as my regression tracking efforts rely on this (and > there might be other people and software out there that does) -- that's > why it's making my work a lot harder if such tags are missing. :-/ > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of > reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack > knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately > will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope > that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me > in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record > straight. > > > [...]
| |