lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 1/2] s390x: KVM: guest support for topology function
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:22:41PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:05:00 +0200
> Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > > +static inline bool kvm_s390_topology_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 11))
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + /* A new vCPU has been hotplugged */
> > > + if (vcpu->arch.prev_cpu == S390_KVM_TOPOLOGY_NEW_CPU)
> > > + return true;
> > > +
> > > + /* The real CPU backing up the vCPU moved to another socket */
> > > + if (cpumask_test_cpu(vcpu->cpu,
> > > + topology_core_cpumask(vcpu->arch.prev_cpu)))
> > > + return true;
> > > +
> > > + return false;
> > > +}
> >
> > This seems to be wrong. I'd guess that you need
> >
> > if (cpumask_test_cpu(vcpu->cpu,
> > topology_core_cpumask(vcpu->arch.prev_cpu)))
> > --> return false;
> > --> return true;
>
> so if the CPU moved to a different socket, it's not a change?
> and if nothing happened, it is a change?

How do you translate the above code to your statement?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-20 20:26    [W:0.097 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site