lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: sifive: fu540-c000: align dma node name with dtschema
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> 於 2022年4月19日 週二 下午6:59寫道:
>
> On 19/04/2022 12:57, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> >>> Not sure that this one is actually needed Krzysztof, Zong Li has a fix
> >>> for this in his series of fixes for the sifive pdma:
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/edd72c0cca1ebceddc032ff6ec2284e3f48c5ad3.1648461096.git.zong.li@sifive.com/
> >>>
> >>> Maybe you could add your review to his version?
> >>
> >> Zong's Li patch was sent 10 days after my patch... [1] Why riscv DTS
> >> patches take so much time to pick up?
> >>
> >
> > Oh, my bad. I incorrectly assumed that that patch was present before v8,
> > I should've checked further back - sorry!
>
> No problem :)
>
> I don't mind Zong's patch to be taken although in general I believe more
> in FIFO (or FIF Served) style.
>

Hi all,
Thanks Conor brings me here. The patch 1 and 4 in my series has been
applied into dmaengine/next, but patch 2 and 3 should go by riscv
tree, so I guess that I could re-send the patch 2 based on top of
Krzysztof's patch, then let's drop the patch 2 & 3 of another
patchset. I will keep follow up here. Thanks all.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-19 14:21    [W:0.060 / U:1.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site