lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/apic: Clarify i82489DX bit overlap in APIC_LVT0
Thomas,

> > For the record, it's documented in the i82498DX datasheet[1] and user
> > manual[2]:
> >
> > 'Bits [19:18] Timer Base: This field selects the time base input to be
> > used by the timer.
>
> That's true, but how many people aside of you and me still have access
> to the i82498DX related documentation? The interwebs has no trace of
> them.

Hmm, actually now that you mention it I recall that archive.org does have
scanned copies of the 1995 Intel486 Microprocessors and Pentium Processors
databooks, and they include the i82489DX datasheet and manual respectively
starting from pages 4-220 (857) and 2-579 (600). See:

<https://archive.org/details/bitsavers_intel80486croprocessorsandRelatedProductsJan95_58561506>

<https://archive.org/details/bitsavers_intelpentirocessorsandRelatedComponents_64170750>

I have uploaded clean copies of the discrete documents to my site now too,
made via a PostScript printer driver with the "print" function of software
included with Intel Data on Demand CDs to handle the proprietary document
format used there. Sadly these are bitmaps rather than searchable PDFs,
but they might be easier to refer to. No better format has been tracked
down. See:

<ftp://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/linux/mips/people/macro/APIC/>

Because why not?

> With the above I explicitely meant the undocumented bit overlap both in
> the current SDMs and the kernel source.

Fair enough. The lore has probably been already forgotten within Intel.

Maciej

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-13 17:56    [W:0.052 / U:0.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site