Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:54:58 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm SDX65 DT bindings | From | Rohit Agarwal <> |
| |
On 4/13/2022 5:51 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/04/2022 14:14, Rohit Agarwal wrote: >> On 4/13/2022 12:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 13/04/2022 08:29, Rohit Agarwal wrote: >>>> On 4/12/2022 2:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> On 12/04/2022 07:07, Rohit Agarwal wrote: >>>>>> Add interconnect IDs for Qualcomm SDX65 platform. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com> >>>>> (...) >>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h >>>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>>> index 0000000..8d02c79 >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ >>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ >>>>> Is it possible to license it the same as bindings (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)? >>>> The qcom related code are marked as GPL 2.0 license >>> This I see here, unless you meant some other qcom related code? >> Yes, I meant the other codes as well because most of them I see (for eg. >> sdx55) have added only GPL 2.0. > Happens, maybe no one pointed out this. The bindings, including headers > because these are part of bindings, are expected to have (GPL-2.0 OR > BSD-2-Clause) license. Just because some bindings or some binding > headers have GPL-2.0, is not a justification that wrong license should > be used.
Okay, understood. Thanks for the clarification. Will update this immediately.
Thanks, Rohit.
> > Best regards, > Krzysztof
| |