lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sc7180: Drop IP0 interconnects
From
On 4/13/22 3:55 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:20 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> @@ -519,8 +500,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id qnoc_of_match[] = {
>> .data = &sc7180_dc_noc},
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-gem-noc",
>> .data = &sc7180_gem_noc},
>> - { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-ipa-virt",
>> - .data = &sc7180_ipa_virt},
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mc-virt",
>> .data = &sc7180_mc_virt},
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mmss-noc",
>
> I have no objection to ${SUBJECT} change landing and based on all your
> research and Alex's review/testing I think it's good to go.
>
> However, now that you're removed the driver that cared about
> "qcom,sc7180-ipa-virt", should we also be removing it from the
> `bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml` file and the `sc7180.dtsi`
> file? I think that removing it from _either_ the driver (like your
> patch here does) _or_ the sc7180.dtsi file would fix the bug, right?
> ...and then removing it from the yaml would just be cleanup...

That's a good point, I hadn't thought about that but you're right.

I think we were too pleased about identifying the problem and
proving it could happen (and cause a crash), so we didn't think
hard enough about this other piece.

Stephen, I think you should re-spin the series and add the
proper change to the binding. You can keep the tags I gave
before.

I've got a note to follow up with similar changes to other
platforms where the interconnect driver includes resource "IP0"
and will plan to do what Doug suggests there too.

-Alex

> -Doug

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-17 16:21    [W:0.719 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site