Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:46:00 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: knav_dma: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync | From | Grygorii Strashko <> |
| |
On 12/04/2022 11:29, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> > > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate > for simplifing code > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> > --- > drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c > index 700d8eecd8c4..061f92c8cf7d 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c > @@ -747,9 +747,8 @@ static int knav_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kdev->list); > > pm_runtime_enable(kdev->dev); > - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev->dev); > + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(kdev->dev); > if (ret < 0) { > - pm_runtime_put_noidle(kdev->dev); > dev_err(kdev->dev, "unable to enable pktdma, err %d\n", ret); > goto err_pm_disable; > }
Thank you. Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
-- Best regards, Grygorii, Ukraine
| |