lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] arch/arm64: Fix topology initialization for core scheduling
From
On 31/03/2022 16:53, Phil Auld wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 04:37:50PM +0200 Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 31/03/2022 15:21, Phil Auld wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:04:31AM +0200 Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>>> On 30/03/2022 17:56, Phil Auld wrote:

[...]

>> Yeah, maybe, it wouldn't hurt I guess. IMHO mentioning stress-ng's prctl
>> needs PR_SCHED_CORE support could also be handy since today's stress-ng
>> packages don't seem to have this yet.
>>
>
> My scripts clone it so I did not realize that was not in prepackaged versions
> yet. But that said, that's really just a way to tickle the problem. Anyone
> using core scheduling on such a system will hit this (at least the WARN part,
> the actual crash was harder to create w/o all the threads and tasks stress-ng
> uses).

OK.

I just saw that there is even a kselftest for this:

9f2699007493 - kselftest: Add test for core sched prctl interface
(2021-05-12 Chris Hyser)

But it doesn't trigger the issue.

> I can send a v3 with a further commit message update.

Sounds good.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-31 17:50    [W:0.042 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site