lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] efi: Allow to enable EFI runtime services by default on RT
Hi Ard, Javier,

Am Do, Mar 31, 2022, schrieb Ard Biesheuvel:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 17:17, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit d9f283ae71af ("efi: Disable runtime services on RT") disabled EFI
> > runtime services by default when the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT option is enabled.
> >
> > The rationale for that commit is that some EFI calls could take too much
> > time, leading to large latencies which is an issue for Real-Time kernels.
> >
> > But a side effect of that change was that now is not possible anymore to
> > enable the EFI runtime services by default when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is set,
> > without passing an efi=runtime command line parameter to the kernel.
> >
> > Instead, let's add a new EFI_DISABLE_RUNTIME boolean Kconfig option, that
> > would be set to n by default but to y if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled.
> >
> > That way, the current behaviour is preserved but gives users a mechanism
> > to enable the EFI runtimes services in their kernels if that is required.
> > For example, if the firmware could guarantee bounded time for EFI calls.
> >
> > Also, having a separate boolean config could allow users to disable the
> > EFI runtime services by default even when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is not set.
> >
> > Reported-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
> > Fixes: d9f283ae71af ("efi: Disable runtime services on RT")
> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Improve commit description to make clear the motivation for the change
> > (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior).
> >
>
> This looks ok to me. I'll queue this up once the merge window closes.
>

In case of (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y && CONFIG_EFI_DISABLE_RUNTIME=n),
shouldn't we add a small message in the kernel log warning that EFI
runtime services are enabled for the RT kernel?

In almost all HW, except custom ones with "verified" firmware, such a
warning would be useful... This is especially true since in the embedded
domain, manually-configured RT kernels are almost always the norm.

Thanks,

--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH | Bahnhofstrasse 3 | D-88690 Uhldingen-Mühlhofen
Phone: +49 7556 25 999 31; Fax.: +49 7556 25 999 99

Hinweise zum Datenschutz finden Sie hier (Informations on data privacy
can be found here): https://linutronix.de/kontakt/Datenschutz.php

Linutronix GmbH | Firmensitz (Registered Office): Uhldingen-Mühlhofen |
Registergericht (Registration Court): Amtsgericht Freiburg i.Br., HRB700
806 | Geschäftsführer (Managing Directors): Heinz Egger, Thomas Gleixner

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-31 21:30    [W:0.044 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site