lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] mm/vmscan: make sure wakeup_kswapd with managed zone
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 03:23:49PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>On 2022/3/28 9:08, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Hi, Wei,
>>
>> Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> wakeup_kswapd() only wake up kswapd when the zone is managed.
>>>
>>> For two callers of wakeup_kswapd(), they are node perspective.
>>>
>>> * wake_all_kswapds
>>> * numamigrate_isolate_page
>>>
>>> If we picked up a !managed zone, this is not we expected.
>>>
>>> This patch makes sure we pick up a managed zone for wakeup_kswapd().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/migrate.c | 2 +-
>>> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>>> index 3d60823afd2d..c4b654c0bdf0 100644
>>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>>> @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_page(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct page *page)
>>> if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING))
>>> return 0;
>>> for (z = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; z >= 0; z--) {
>>> - if (populated_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z))
>>> + if (managed_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z))
>>
>> This looks good to me! Thanks! It seems that we can replace
>> populated_zone() in migrate_balanced_pgdat() too. Right?
>
>This patch looks good to me too. Thanks!
>
>BTW: This makes me remember the bewilderment when I read the relevant code.
>It's very kind of you if you could tell me the difference between
>managed_zone and populated_zone. IIUC, when the caller relies on the

The difference is managed_zone means the zone has pages managed by buddy,
while populated_zone means the zone has pages but may be reserved.

>activity from buddy system, managed_zone should always be used. I think
>there're many places like compaction need to use managed_zone but
>populated_zone is used now. They might need to change to use managed_zone
>too. Or am I miss something?

This thread comes from the read of commit 6aa303defb74, which adjust the
vmscan code. It looks like there is some mis-use in compaction, but I didn't
get time to go through it.

>
>Many Thanks. :)

--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-29 02:48    [W:1.243 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site