lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 0/4] Allow guest access to EFI confidential computing secret area
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:42:50AM +0000, Dov Murik wrote:
> Confidential computing (coco) hardware such as AMD SEV (Secure Encrypted
> Virtualization) allows guest owners to inject secrets into the VMs
> memory without the host/hypervisor being able to read them. In SEV,
> secret injection is performed early in the VM launch process, before the
> guest starts running.
>
> OVMF already reserves designated area for secret injection (in its
> AmdSev package; see edk2 commit 01726b6d23d4 "OvmfPkg/AmdSev: Expose the
> Sev Secret area using a configuration table" [1]), but the secrets were
> not available in the guest kernel.
>
> The patch series keeps the address of the EFI-provided memory for
> injected secrets, and exposes the secrets to userspace via securityfs
> using a new efi_secret kernel module. The module is autoloaded (by the
> EFI driver) if the secret area is populated.

Right, so this thing.

Tom and I were talking about SEV* guest debugging today and I believe
there might be another use case for this: SEV-ES guests cannot find out
from an attestation report - like SNP guests can - whether they're being
debugged or not so it would be very helpful if the fact that a -ES guest
is being debugged, could be supplied through such a secrets blob.

Because then, when I'm singlestepping the guest with gdb over the
gdbstub, the guest could determine based on those guest-owner previously
injected secrets whether it should allow debugging or not.

And this is where your set comes in.

However, I'm wondering if - instead of defining your own secrets structs
etc - you could use the SNP confidential computing blob machinery the
SNP set is adding. In particular:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220307213356.2797205-30-brijesh.singh@amd.com/

And you're adding another GUID but maybe you could simply use the SNP
thing called EFI_CC_BLOB_GUID and mimick that layout.

That should unify things more. And then guest kernel code could query
the blob also for debugging policy and so on.

Thoughts, opinions?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Ivo Totev, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-24 17:37    [W:0.197 / U:0.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site