Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Mar 2022 13:38:02 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tip tree |
| |
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:45:16 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:04:05PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:55:49PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:03:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x864 allmodconfig) > > > > > produced these new warnings: > > > > > > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: arch_rethook_prepare()+0x55: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: arch_rethook_trampoline_callback()+0x3e: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: unwind_next_frame()+0x93e: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: unwind_next_frame()+0x5f2: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: unwind_next_frame()+0x4a7: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __rethook_find_ret_addr()+0x81: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __rethook_find_ret_addr()+0x90: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rethook_trampoline_handler()+0x8c: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rethook_trampoline_handler()+0x9b: relocation to !ENDBR: arch_rethook_trampoline+0x0 > > > > > > > > Hurmph, lemme go figure out where that code comes from, I've not seen > > > > those. > > > > > > Ahh, something tracing. I'll go do some patches on top of it. > > > > Also, that x86 patch has never his x86@kernel.org and doesn't have an > > ACK from any x86 person :-((( > > Worse, it adds a 3rd return trampoline without replacing any of the > existing two :-(
Sorry about this. I missed to add Ccing to arch maintainers. Let me check how I can fix those errors.
Thanks.
> > Why was this merged?
-- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
| |