lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] scheduler updates for v5.18
Date
Hi, Ingo,

Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes:

> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 6:13 AM Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:54:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > > > Huang Ying (3):
>> > > > sched/numa-balancing: Move some document to make it consistent with the code
>> > > > sched/numa: Fix NUMA topology for systems with CPU-less nodes
>> > > > sched/numa: Avoid migrating task to CPU-less node
>> > >
>> > > Linus, I don't think you want to merge this as-is. This will introduce a
>> > > kernel crash on arm64 NUMA as mentioned in this thread,
>> >
>> > Ok, dropped from my queue. Thanks,
>>
>> I've reverted the broken commit & will send another pull request after
>> some testing. Sorry about that!
>
> Ended up using the fix below instead - it's tested already on the affected
> system.
>

Thanks a lot for your help!

Is it a general rule to send a fixing patch for the bug of a patch
merged by tip tree? Or a new version of the patch is acceptable too?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-22 09:19    [W:0.051 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site