Messages in this thread | | | From | "Huang, Ying" <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler updates for v5.18 | Date | Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:18:57 +0800 |
| |
Hi, Ingo,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > >> >> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 6:13 AM Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:54:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > > > Huang Ying (3): >> > > > sched/numa-balancing: Move some document to make it consistent with the code >> > > > sched/numa: Fix NUMA topology for systems with CPU-less nodes >> > > > sched/numa: Avoid migrating task to CPU-less node >> > > >> > > Linus, I don't think you want to merge this as-is. This will introduce a >> > > kernel crash on arm64 NUMA as mentioned in this thread, >> > >> > Ok, dropped from my queue. Thanks, >> >> I've reverted the broken commit & will send another pull request after >> some testing. Sorry about that! > > Ended up using the fix below instead - it's tested already on the affected > system. >
Thanks a lot for your help!
Is it a general rule to send a fixing patch for the bug of a patch merged by tip tree? Or a new version of the patch is acceptable too?
Best Regards, Huang, Ying
| |