lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5] mm/hwpoison: fix race between hugetlb free/demotion and memory_failure_hugetlb()
Date
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 05:46:48PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:16 PM Naoya Horiguchi
> <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> >
> > There is a race condition between memory_failure_hugetlb() and hugetlb
> > free/demotion, which causes setting PageHWPoison flag on the wrong page.
> > The one simple result is that wrong processes can be killed, but another
> > (more serious) one is that the actual error is left unhandled, so no one
> > prevents later access to it, and that might lead to more serious results
> > like consuming corrupted data.
> >
> > Think about the below race window:
> >
> > CPU 1 CPU 2
> > memory_failure_hugetlb
> > struct page *head = compound_head(p);
> > hugetlb page might be freed to
> > buddy, or even changed to another
> > compound page.
> >
> > get_hwpoison_page -- page is not what we want now...
> >
> > The compound_head is called outside hugetlb_lock, so the head is not
> > reliable.
> >
> > So set PageHWPoison flag after passing prechecks. And to detect
> > potential violation, this patch also introduces a new action type
> > MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_PAGE_SIZE.
> >
> > Reported-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
...
> > @@ -1547,21 +1545,31 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> > * If this happens just bail out.
> > */
> > if (!PageHuge(p) || compound_head(p) != head) {
> > + if (TestSetPageHWPoison(p))
> > + already_hwpoisoned = pfn;
> > + else
> > + num_poisoned_pages_inc();
> > action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_PAGE_SIZE, MF_IGNORED);
>
> The commit log says "this patch also introduces a new action type
> MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_PAGE_SIZE", but it is not defined in the patch and it
> is called here. Did I miss something?

Sorry, you're right. MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_PAGE_SIZE is defined in the separate
patch in mmotm, and disappeared when rebasing (not intended).
I think of rebasing this to mainline again to apply cleanly to -stable,
expecting it to applied before other recent hwpoison patches.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-22 03:56    [W:3.526 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site