lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/4] OPP: Add support of "opp-microwatt" for advanced EM registration
From


On 3/2/22 07:45, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 01-03-22, 09:35, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> /**
>> * dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() - Attempt to register an Energy Model
>> * @dev : Device for which an Energy Model has to be registered
>> @@ -1517,6 +1567,12 @@ int dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct device *dev, struct cpumask *cpus)
>> goto failed;
>> }
>>
>> + /* First, try to find more precised Energy Model in DT */
>> + if (_of_has_opp_microwatt_property(dev)) {
>> + em_cb.active_power = _get_dt_power;
>
> You can also do (to fix the warning) this instead:
>
> em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(_get_dt_power);
>
> Similar for the else part.
>

Unfortunately, not for this case. When we declare that em_cb
it can handle the brackets '{ }', but not later in the code no.
In both configs it won't fly:

EM:
drivers/opp/of.c: In function ‘dev_pm_opp_of_register_em’:
./include/linux/energy_model.h:118:38: error: expected expression before
‘{’ token
#define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { .active_power = &_active_power_cb }
^
drivers/opp/of.c:1573:11: note: in expansion of macro ‘EM_DATA_CB’
em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(_get_dt_power);
^~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/energy_model.h:118:38: error: expected expression before
‘{’ token
#define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { .active_power = &_active_power_cb }
^
drivers/opp/of.c:1600:10: note: in expansion of macro ‘EM_DATA_CB’
em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(_get_power);
^~~~~~~~~~

!EM:
drivers/opp/of.c: In function ‘dev_pm_opp_of_register_em’:
./include/linux/energy_model.h:266:38: error: expected expression before
‘{’ token
#define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { }
^
drivers/opp/of.c:1573:11: note: in expansion of macro ‘EM_DATA_CB’
em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(_get_dt_power);
^~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/energy_model.h:266:38: error: expected expression before
‘{’ token
#define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { }
^
drivers/opp/of.c:1600:10: note: in expansion of macro ‘EM_DATA_CB’
em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(_get_power);
^~~~~~~~~~


If you like, I can introduce new dual-macro implementation
in energy_modle.h which would sole this issue:

ifdef EM:
#define EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, cb) ((em_cb).active_power = cb)

ifndef EM:
#define EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, cb) do { } while (0)


Then we would keep the single call to the registration EM and
we would have:

if (_of_has_opp_microwatt_property(dev)) {
EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, _get_dt_power);
goto register_em;
}



EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, _get_power);

register_em:
ret = em_dev_register_perf_domain(dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, cpus, true);


I can do that, please let me know.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-02 09:51    [W:0.061 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site