lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: (adt7475) Use enum chips when loading attenuator settings
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:30:50AM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> Simplify load_attenuators() by making use of enum chips instead of int.
>

That isn't the only thing the patch is doing.

> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changes in v2:
> - New
>
> drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c b/drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c
> index 6de501de41b2..ebe4a85eb62e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/adt7475.c
> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int set_property_bit(const struct i2c_client *client, char *property,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int load_attenuators(const struct i2c_client *client, int chip,
> +static int load_attenuators(const struct i2c_client *client, enum chips chip,
> struct adt7475_data *data)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ static int load_attenuators(const struct i2c_client *client, int chip,
> data->config4);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> - } else if (chip == adt7473 || chip == adt7475) {
> + } else {

This is the real change. Well, in theory. It doesn't really make a difference,
it is just (currently) unnecessary but clarifies that the following code only
applies to the two chips. It may be better to replace the if/else with a switch
statement to clarify this. Dropping the conditional would not require to change
the parameter type. That only really adds value if you also use a switch
statement (without dummy default).

Thanks,
Guenter

> set_property_bit(client, "adi,bypass-attenuator-in1",
> &data->config2, 5);
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-18 15:33    [W:1.257 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site