lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8712: Fix CamelCase warnings
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 03:44:40PM +0530, Sathish Kumar wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warnings like:
> CHECK: Avoid CamelCase: <blnEnableRxFF0Filter>
> + u8 blnEnableRxFF0Filter;
>
> Signed-off-by: Sathish Kumar <skumark1902@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove the "bln" prefix
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/drv_types.h | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/xmit_linux.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/drv_types.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/drv_types.h
> index a44d04effc8b..4de3aad08242 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/drv_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/drv_types.h
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ struct _adapter {
> struct iw_statistics iwstats;
> int pid; /*process id from UI*/
> struct work_struct wk_filter_rx_ff0;
> - u8 blnEnableRxFF0Filter;
> + u8 enable_rx_ff0_filter;

Shouldn't this be a boolean?

> spinlock_t lock_rx_ff0_filter;
> const struct firmware *fw;
> struct usb_interface *pusb_intf;
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c
> index acda930722b2..69d3c55ee9e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ u8 r8712_sitesurvey_cmd(struct _adapter *padapter,
> mod_timer(&pmlmepriv->scan_to_timer,
> jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SCANNING_TIMEOUT));
> padapter->ledpriv.LedControlHandler(padapter, LED_CTL_SITE_SURVEY);
> - padapter->blnEnableRxFF0Filter = 0;
> + padapter->enable_rx_ff0_filter = 0;
> return _SUCCESS;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/xmit_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/xmit_linux.c
> index 90d34cf9d2ff..d58ae5b387d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/xmit_linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/xmit_linux.c
> @@ -102,11 +102,11 @@ void r8712_SetFilter(struct work_struct *work)
> r8712_write8(adapter, 0x117, newvalue);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->lock_rx_ff0_filter, irqL);
> - adapter->blnEnableRxFF0Filter = 1;
> + adapter->enable_rx_ff0_filter = 1;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->lock_rx_ff0_filter, irqL);
> do {
> msleep(100);
> - } while (adapter->blnEnableRxFF0Filter == 1);
> + } while (adapter->enable_rx_ff0_filter == 1);

Ah, that's funny. It's amazing it works at all and that the compiler
doesn't optimize this away. This isn't a good pattern to use in kernel
code. I know it's not caused by your change here, but perhaps you might
want to fix this up to work properly?

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-18 12:28    [W:0.351 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site