lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek: Add YAML schema for PCIe PHY
From
Il 18/03/22 10:54, Jianjun Wang ha scritto:
> Add YAML schema documentation for PCIe PHY on MediaTek chipsets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml | 75 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..868bf976568b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek PCIe PHY
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + The PCIe PHY supports physical layer functionality for PCIe Gen3 port.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: mediatek,mt8195-pcie-phy

Since I don't expect this driver to be only for MT8195, but to be extended to
support some more future MediaTek SoCs and, depending on the number of differences
in the possible future Gen4 PHYs, even different gen's, I propose to add a generic
compatible as const.

So you'll have something like:

- enum:
- mediatek,mt8195-pcie-phy
- const: mediatek,pcie-gen3-phy

> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +

..snip..

> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + phy@11e80000 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-pcie-phy";

... which would reflect here as

compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-pcie-phy", "mediatek,pcie-gen3-phy"

> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + reg = <0x11e80000 0x10000>;
> + reg-names = "sif";
> + nvmem-cells = <&pciephy_glb_intr>,
> + <&pciephy_tx_ln0_pmos>,
> + <&pciephy_tx_ln0_nmos>,
> + <&pciephy_rx_ln0>,
> + <&pciephy_tx_ln1_pmos>,
> + <&pciephy_tx_ln1_nmos>,
> + <&pciephy_rx_ln1>;
> + nvmem-cell-names = "glb_intr", "tx_ln0_pmos",
> + "tx_ln0_nmos", "rx_ln0",
> + "tx_ln1_pmos", "tx_ln1_nmos",
> + "rx_ln1";
> + power-domains = <&spm 2>;
> + };


Regards,
Angelo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-18 12:14    [W:0.105 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site