lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] virito-pci-modern: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:59 AM <cgel.zte@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
>
> As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never fail if
> dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
> So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
>
> Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> index e8b3ff2b9fbc..dff0b15a239d 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> @@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ int vp_modern_probe(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev)
> }
>
> err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> - if (err)
> - err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev,
> - DMA_BIT_MASK(32));

So we had:

if (!dev->dma_mask || !dma_supported(dev, mask))
return -EIO;

in dma_set_mask(), any reason dma_supported() can't be false here?

Thanks

> if (err)
> dev_warn(&pci_dev->dev, "Failed to enable 64-bit or 32-bit DMA. Trying to continue, but this might not work.\n");
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-18 03:23    [W:0.043 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site