lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mmc: block: enable cache-flushing when mmc cache is on
Date
>So we are not going to let the block layer know about SD cache?
>Or is it a separate change?

I have some code for this laying around, but as it requires reading, parsing and writing Function Registers,
in particular PEH, it's a lot of boilerplate code to get the functionality, but I'll clean it up and send a patch in the coming weeks.





From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 12:28 PM
To: Avri Altman; Michael Wu; ulf.hansson@linaro.org; beanhuo@micron.com; porzio@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; allwinner-opensource-support
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: enable cache-flushing when mmc cache is on
 
On 16.3.2022 13.09, Avri Altman wrote:
>> Hi Avril & Adrian,
>> Thanks for your efforts. Could we have an agreement now --
>>
>> 1. enabling-cache and cmd23/reliable-write should be independent;
>>
>> Here's what I found in the spec JESD84-B51:
>>  > 6.6.31 Cache
>>  > Caching of data shall apply only for the single block
>>  > read/write(CMD17/24), pre-defined multiple block
>>  > read/write(CMD23+CMD18/25) and open ended multiple block
>>  > read/write(CMD18/25+CMD12) commands and excludes any other access
>>  > e.g., to the register space(e.g., CMD6).
>> Which means with CMD18/25+CMD12 (without using CMD23), the cache can
>> also be enabled. Maybe this could be an evidence of the independence
>> between enabling-cache and cmd23/reliable-write?
> Acked-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
>>
>> 2. We don't consider supporting SD in this change.
>>
>>  > On 14/03/2022 19:10, Avri Altman wrote:
>>  >> Here is what our SD system guys wrote:
>>  >> " In SD we don’t support reliable write and this eMMC driver may not
>>  >>    be utilizing the cache feature we added in SD5.0.
>>  >>   The method of cache flush is different between SD and eMMC."
>>  >>
>>  >> So adding SD seems to be out of scope of this change.
>>
>> Is there anything else I can do about this patch? Thanks again.

So we are not going to let the block layer know about SD cache?
Or is it a separate change?
=
Hyperstone GmbH | Reichenaustr. 39a | 78467 Konstanz
Managing Director: Dr. Jan Peter Berns.
Commercial register of local courts: Freiburg HRB381782

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-16 15:53    [W:0.286 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site