lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 1/6] soc: mediatek: mutex: add common interface to accommodate multiple modules operationg MUTEX
From
Il 15/03/22 07:10, Moudy Ho ha scritto:
> In order to allow multiple modules to operate MUTEX hardware through
> a common interfrace, a flexible index "mtk_mutex_table_index" needs to
> be added to replace original component ID so that like DDP and MDP
> can add their own MUTEX table settings independently.
>
> In addition, 4 generic interface "mtk_mutex_set_mod", "mtk_mutex_set_sof",
> "mtk_mutex_clear_mod" and "mtk_mutex_clear_sof" have been added, which is
> expected to replace the "mtk_mutex_add_comp" and "mtk_mutex_remove_comp"
> pair originally dedicated to DDP in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.h | 33 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> index aaf8fc1abb43..778b01ce9e8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ struct mtk_mutex_data {
> const unsigned int *mutex_sof;
> const unsigned int mutex_mod_reg;
> const unsigned int mutex_sof_reg;
> + const unsigned long long *mutex_table_mod;

Can we change this to u64 instead?

With that done,

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-15 10:11    [W:0.079 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site