Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:12:10 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/mremap:: Use vma_lookup() instead of find_vma() | From | David Hildenbrand <> |
| |
On 12.03.22 09:31, Miaohe Lin wrote: > Using vma_lookup() verifies the address is contained in the found vma. > This results in easier to read the code. > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> > --- > mm/mremap.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c > index 002eec83e91e..9d76da79594d 100644 > --- a/mm/mremap.c > +++ b/mm/mremap.c > @@ -942,8 +942,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(mremap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, old_len, > > if (mmap_write_lock_killable(current->mm)) > return -EINTR; > - vma = find_vma(mm, addr); > - if (!vma || vma->vm_start > addr) { > + vma = vma_lookup(mm, addr); > + if (!vma) { > ret = EFAULT; > goto out; > }
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
-- Thanks,
David / dhildenb
| |