Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Mar 2022 16:53:32 -0800 | From | Fangrui Song <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 01/39] kbuild: Fix clang build |
| |
On 2022-03-01, Kees Cook wrote: >On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 01:16:04PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >> Also, Kees mentions this is an issue for testing multiple different >> versions of gcc, too. There perhaps is a way to simplify the builds >> for BOTH toolchains; i.e. a yet-to-be-created shared variable denoting >> the suffix for binaries? The primary pain point seems to be Debian's >> suffixing scheme; it will suffix GCC, clang, and lld, but not GNU >> binutils IIUC. > >Right. Though I think auto-detection still makes sense. > >If I do: > > make CC=clang-12 LLVM=1 > >it'd be nice if it also used ld.lld-12.
This transformation may be a bit magical.
On Debian, /usr/bin/clang-13 is a symlink to /usr/lib/llvm-13/bin/clang . Will it be fine for the user to provide correct feasible PATH?
>> [...] >> Just curious, what prefixes have you observed in the wild? > >For me, where ever I built clang, and "/usr/bin" > >-- >Kees Cook >
| |