lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] phy: cadence: Sierra: Add support for skipping configuration
From
Date
Hi Vinod,

On 03/02/22 5:44 am, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 02-02-22, 20:14, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>> Hi Vinod,
>>
>> On 02/02/22 7:53 pm, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> On 28-01-22, 12:56, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>>>> In some cases, a single SerDes instance can be shared between two different
>>>> processors, each using a separate link. In these cases, the SerDes
>>>> configuration is done in an earlier boot stage. Therefore, add support to
>>>> skip reconfiguring, if it is was already configured beforehand.
>>>
>>> This fails to apply, pls rebase and resend
>>>
>>
>> On rebasing, I am seeing no difference in the patch and I am able to
>> apply it on top of linux-next/master commit 6abab1b81b65. May I know if
>> there is any other branch that I would need to rebase this patch on top of?
>
> It should be based on phy-next which is at
> 1f1b0c105b19ac0d90975e2569040da1216489b7 now
>

I have posted a respin of this patch after rebasing it on top of
phy-next. One aspect that is not clear to me is, phy-next branch does
not have the following commit which is present in linux-next master,

29afbd769ca3 phy: cadence: Sierra: fix error handling bugs in probe()

When the respin of this patch(v3) is merged with linux-next/master
wouldn't it cause merge-conflicts?

May I know how would this be handled?

Link to v3:
- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=610903

Thanks,
Aswath

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-03 06:56    [W:0.116 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site