Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] phy: cadence: Sierra: Add support for skipping configuration | From | Aswath Govindraju <> | Date | Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:25:29 +0530 |
| |
Hi Vinod,
On 03/02/22 5:44 am, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 02-02-22, 20:14, Aswath Govindraju wrote: >> Hi Vinod, >> >> On 02/02/22 7:53 pm, Vinod Koul wrote: >>> On 28-01-22, 12:56, Aswath Govindraju wrote: >>>> In some cases, a single SerDes instance can be shared between two different >>>> processors, each using a separate link. In these cases, the SerDes >>>> configuration is done in an earlier boot stage. Therefore, add support to >>>> skip reconfiguring, if it is was already configured beforehand. >>> >>> This fails to apply, pls rebase and resend >>> >> >> On rebasing, I am seeing no difference in the patch and I am able to >> apply it on top of linux-next/master commit 6abab1b81b65. May I know if >> there is any other branch that I would need to rebase this patch on top of? > > It should be based on phy-next which is at > 1f1b0c105b19ac0d90975e2569040da1216489b7 now >
I have posted a respin of this patch after rebasing it on top of phy-next. One aspect that is not clear to me is, phy-next branch does not have the following commit which is present in linux-next master,
29afbd769ca3 phy: cadence: Sierra: fix error handling bugs in probe()
When the respin of this patch(v3) is merged with linux-next/master wouldn't it cause merge-conflicts?
May I know how would this be handled?
Link to v3: - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=610903
Thanks, Aswath
| |