lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)
Date


> On Feb 24, 2022, at 11:37 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/24/22 07:08, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>>>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>>>>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since 20220217:
>>>>>
>>>>> on x86_64:
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
>>>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
>>>>> Selected by [y]:
>>>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
>>>
>>> Hi Chuck,
>>>
>>> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223...
>>
>> I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig
>> you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in
>> fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ?
>
> Not all of it -- it's missing one line:
>
>> config NFSD_V2_ACL
>> bool
>> depends on NFSD
>>
>> config NFSD_V3_ACL
>> bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension"
>> depends on NFSD <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>> select NFSD_V2_ACL
>> help
>
> When I add that, I no longer see the problem.

That's the fix. I guess next-20220223 hasn't pulled in my latest
for-next yet.

--
Chuck Lever



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-24 17:47    [W:0.059 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site