lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
Date
Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2022, 11:02:48 CET schrieb Lee Jones:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2022, 10:16:01 CET schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >
> > > > Include generic pwm.yaml schema, which enforces PWM node naming. Keep
> > > > the old name in bindings as deprecated.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml | 4 ++++
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
> > what is your expectation regarding this patch?
> >
> > Are you planning to merge it or are you expecting this to go through
> > some other tree?
> >
> > The binding-change here is backward-comaptible in that the old
> > node-name is still in it, only marked as deprecated, so in theory
> > this patch should be able to be applied on its own without
> > causing defects.
>
> In an ideal world, it would be broken up and I would take the MFD
> part. Is that possible or are there dependencies?

That is also what Krzysztof had in mind - see his reply to patch4.
Binding going through the MFD tree and soc maintainers applying
the individual dts patches.

As written the binding change is backward compatible, so no harm.

I was just confused by the "Acked-by" and wanted to clarify how you
see it ;-)


Heiko





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-24 11:07    [W:0.098 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site