Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:30:27 +0100 | From | Clément Léger <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: at91: pm: add support for sama5d2 secure suspend |
| |
Le Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:15:44 +0800, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> a écrit :
> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_secure.o: in function `sama5_pm_init': > >> (.init.text+0x10c): multiple definition of `sama5_pm_init'; arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.o:(.init.text+0x1b58): first defined here > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_secure.o: in function `sama5d2_pm_init': > >> (.init.text+0x160): multiple definition of `sama5d2_pm_init'; arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.o:(.init.text+0x1c0c): first defined here > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_secure.o: in function `at91_suspend_entering_slow_clock': > >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `at91_suspend_entering_slow_clock'; arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.o:(.text+0x80): first defined here > > Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ATMEL_PM > Depends on ARCH_AT91 && !ATMEL_SECURE_PM > Selected by > - SOC_SAMA7 && ARCH_AT91 && PM
Actually, using mutually exclusive option for ATMEL_PM and ATMEL_SECURE_PM does not seems to fit this really well. I guess it would be better to integrate secure PM handling inside existing PM.c code.
-- Clément Léger, Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin https://bootlin.com
| |