lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/9] serial: core: move RS485 configuration tasks from drivers into core
From
On 22. 02. 22, 7:51, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 22. 02. 22, 2:14, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> Several drivers that support setting the RS485 configuration via
>> userspace
>> implement one or more of the following tasks:
>>
>> - in case of an invalid RTS configuration (both RTS after send and RTS on
>>    send set or both unset) fall back to enable RTS on send and disable
>> RTS
>>    after send
>>
>> - nullify the padding field of the returned serial_rs485 struct
>>
>> - copy the configuration into the uart port struct
>>
>> - limit RTS delays to 100 ms
>>
>> Move these tasks into the serial core to make them generic and to provide
>> a consistent behaviour among all drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
>> ---
>>   drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> index 846192a7b4bf..2b3afe038c1c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ static struct lock_class_key port_lock_key;
>>   #define HIGH_BITS_OFFSET    ((sizeof(long)-sizeof(int))*8)
>> +/*
>> + * Max time with active RTS before/after data is sent.
>> + */
>> +#define RS485_MAX_RTS_DELAY    100 /* msecs */
>> +
>>   static void uart_change_speed(struct tty_struct *tty, struct
>> uart_state *state,
>>                       struct ktermios *old_termios);
>>   static void uart_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct *tty, int timeout);
>> @@ -1282,8 +1287,32 @@ static int uart_set_rs485_config(struct
>> uart_port *port,
>>       if (copy_from_user(&rs485, rs485_user, sizeof(*rs485_user)))
>>           return -EFAULT;
>> +    /* pick sane settings if the user hasn't */
>> +    if (!(rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
>> +        !(rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) {
>> +        pr_warn("invalid RTS setting, using RTS_ON_SEND instead\n");
>
> Can't we have a device prefix here, so that everyone knows what device
> is affected? Without that, it's not that useful. At least port->name &
> port->line could be printed. The uart core uses dev_* prints, but prints
> also line as uport->dev can be NULL sometimes.

And this comes from userspace, so should be ratelimited.

--
js
suse labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-22 07:55    [W:0.078 / U:0.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site