Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:17:01 +0000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] hisi_ptt: Register PMU device for PTT trace | From | John Garry <> |
| |
> + > static irqreturn_t hisi_ptt_irq(int irq, void *context) > { > struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt = context; > @@ -169,7 +233,7 @@ static irqreturn_t hisi_ptt_irq(int irq, void *context) > if (!(status & HISI_PTT_TRACE_INT_STAT_MASK)) > return IRQ_NONE; > > - return IRQ_HANDLED; > + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; > } > > static void hisi_ptt_irq_free_vectors(void *pdev) > @@ -192,8 +256,10 @@ static int hisi_ptt_register_irq(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt) > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_DMA_IRQ), > - hisi_ptt_irq, 0, DRV_NAME, hisi_ptt); > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev,
why add code in patch 2/8 and then immediately change 3/8?
> + pci_irq_vector(pdev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_DMA_IRQ), > + hisi_ptt_irq, hisi_ptt_isr, 0, > + DRV_NAME, hisi_ptt); > if (ret) { > pci_err(pdev, "failed to request irq %d, ret = %d.\n", > pci_irq_vector(pdev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_DMA_IRQ), ret); > @@ -270,6 +336,429 @@ static void hisi_ptt_init_ctrls(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt) > hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl.default_cpu = cpumask_first(cpumask_of_node(dev_to_node(&pdev->dev))); > } > > +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_FILTER_IS_PORT BIT(19) > +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_FILTER_VAL_MASK GENMASK(15, 0) > +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_DIRECTION_MASK GENMASK(23, 20) > +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_TYPE_MASK GENMASK(31, 24) > +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_FORMAT_MASK GENMASK(35, 32) > + > +static ssize_t available_root_port_filters_show(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, > + char *buf) > +{ > + struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt = to_hisi_ptt(dev_get_drvdata(dev)); > + struct hisi_ptt_filter_desc *filter; > + int pos = 0; > + > + if (list_empty(&hisi_ptt->port_filters)) > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "\n"); > + > + mutex_lock(&hisi_ptt->mutex); > + list_for_each_entry(filter, &hisi_ptt->port_filters, list) > + pos += sysfs_emit_at(buf, pos, "%s 0x%05lx\n", > + pci_name(filter->pdev), > + hisi_ptt_get_filter_val(filter->pdev) | > + HISI_PTT_PMU_FILTER_IS_PORT); > + > + mutex_unlock(&hisi_ptt->mutex); > + return pos; > +} > +static DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(available_root_port_filters); > + > +static ssize_t available_requester_filters_show(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, > + char *buf) > +{ > + struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt = to_hisi_ptt(dev_get_drvdata(dev)); > + struct hisi_ptt_filter_desc *filter; > + int pos = 0; > + > + if (list_empty(&hisi_ptt->port_filters))
is this supposed to be req_filters? And is it safe to access without locking?
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "\n"); > + > + mutex_lock(&hisi_ptt->mutex); > + list_for_each_entry(filter, &hisi_ptt->req_filters, list) > + pos += sysfs_emit_at(buf, pos, "%s 0x%05x\n", > + pci_name(filter->pdev), > + hisi_ptt_get_filter_val(filter->pdev)); > + > + mutex_unlock(&hisi_ptt->mutex); > + return pos; > +} > +static DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(available_requester_filters); > + > +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(filter, "config:0-19"); > +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(direction, "config:20-23"); > +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(type, "config:24-31"); > +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(format, "config:32-35"); > + > +static struct attribute *hisi_ptt_pmu_format_attrs[] = { > + &format_attr_filter.attr, > + &format_attr_direction.attr, > + &format_attr_type.attr, > + &format_attr_format.attr, > + NULL > +}; > + > +static struct attribute_group hisi_ptt_pmu_format_group = { > + .name = "format", > + .attrs = hisi_ptt_pmu_format_attrs, > +}; > + > +static struct attribute *hisi_ptt_pmu_filter_attrs[] = { > + &dev_attr_available_root_port_filters.attr, > + &dev_attr_available_requester_filters.attr, > + NULL > +}; > + > +static struct attribute_group hisi_ptt_pmu_filter_group = { > + .attrs = hisi_ptt_pmu_filter_attrs, > +}; > + > +static const struct attribute_group *hisi_ptt_pmu_groups[] = { > + &hisi_ptt_pmu_format_group, > + &hisi_ptt_pmu_filter_group, > + NULL > +}; > + > +/* > + * The supported value of the direction parameter. See hisi_ptt.rst > + * documentation for more details. > + */ > +static u32 hisi_ptt_trace_available_direction[] = { > + 0, > + 1, > + 2, > + 3,
this seems a very odd array.
And I assume it is const as it is modified - can this be non-global and tied to the device context?
> +}; > + > +/* Different types can be set simultaneously */ > +static u32 hisi_ptt_trace_available_type[] = { > + 1, /* posted_request */ > + 2, /* non-posted_request */ > + 4, /* completion */ > +}; > + > +static u32 hisi_ptt_trace_availble_format[] = { > + 0, /* 4DW */ > + 1, /* 8DW */ > +}; > +
| |